« Blogswap Week Two: Bringing Branders and HR Professionals Together | Main | The Myth of the Passive Candidate »

August 02, 2006

Blogswap Week Three: Inside the Sausage Factory

Today's blogswap posting comes courtesy of Colin Kingsbury, COO of HRMDirect.com.

John Sumser's article today raises an interesting question about blogs: What's the point? As Sumser writes,

There's every reason to suspect that the Recruiting Blogosphere is a small Mutual Admiration Society with no visible means of support. If you ask the many (97.5%) recruiters who aren't reading, there's no question that blogs simply are not a part of getting things done. They are busy filling seats.. If you ask the participants, it's an exciting new universe. The perspectives couldn't be more different.

The question is apposite. On one hand we have the stories of Howard Dean and the Swift Boat Vets to prove that blogs can change the course of things as large as presidential campaigns. On the other hand, there are not really any breakout stories of blogs driving similar breakout results in any business area, let alone in recruiting.

The problem lies in the failure of participants to use the medium to its full advantage. More than any other medium short of a conversation at the corner bar, blogs have the ability to present a sense of transparency to the reader. The typical company website, press release, and job listing batter the reader with a faceless and unrelenting positivity not unlike the ever-increasing wheat harvests of a Soviet five-year plan. A blog post, especially with comments enabled, presents an opportunity to engage the reader in a different kind of conversation.

From the perspective of a corporate client or candidate, third-party recruiters are complete unknowns. As a client I would love to read about the diamond-in-the-rough that you placed to fill an impossible job order. As a candidate I want to hear from other candidates you’ve placed who benefited greatly from your advice. But what do I see on recruiting blogs? Mostly shop talk directed at other recruiters. It may be valuable and educational, but it is not sales or marketing. Why don’t more TPR-bloggers talk about what they do, as opposed to how or why they do it?

Transparency is difficult and painful at times. Ask Gretchen Ledgard, who as a Microsoft recruiter blogged about hiring managers acting like, well, hiring managers. Her post fit Michael Kinsley’s classic definition of a gaffe as “when a politician accidentally tells the truth.” The question is, did Microsoft benefit? We have only Gretchen’s statements to go on, but the answer would appear to be “yes,” right up to the point where the experience helped convince her to leave the company. Like those Soviet central planners, companies can choose to publish only carefully-designed good news about themselves, but they can’t put real bread on the shelves unless the wheat was actually harvested. The Internet is increasingly making highly-detailed information about companies accessible to the general public for the cost of typing a few words into a search engine. You may not let your recruiters say anything remotely challenging about your interview process, but the people you interview and don’t hire are not under any such restrictions. And we all know the story about how a bad experience will reach ten times the people a good one will. With blogs, that one bad story can reach a thousand. Today transparency is a choice, tomorrow it may be a fact.

Posted by davidkippen at August 2, 2006 08:56 PM

Comments

The business world has not even begun to tap into the power of blogs. See my post at the Cenek Report dealing with "blogging for organization change."

robert edward cenek
www.cenekreport.com

Posted by: Robert Edward Cenek at August 18, 2006 09:00 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?